Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 13 | Android 14 |
| 2023-05-04 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a bit better than Motorola Edge 40, having a general score of 77.8 against 77.2. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's design is newer and way thinner than Motorola Edge 40's, although it is a lot heavier. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has 14 version and Motorola Edge 40 has Android 13.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a brighter screen than Motorola Edge 40, because it has a lot higher 2200 x 2480 resolution, a larger screen, a bit higher pixel density and a really brighter display. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 40, because it has more internal storage.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a little faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 40, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have a back facing camera with a 50 mega pixels, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a bigger camera sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with superior battery duration than Motorola Edge 40, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.