| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2024-04-16 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.37 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Forest Blue - PMMA; Hot Pink - Vegan Suede; Marshmallow Blue - Vegan Leather | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 1 Gen 6 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Galaxy C9 Pro is a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, with a score of 81 against 74.6. Both phones in this comparison review use Android operating system, but the Galaxy C9 Pro has newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and Motorola Edge 50 Fusion has Android 14 version, so it gives you a couple additional features and performance optimizations. Despite of the fact the Galaxy C9 Pro is extremely older and a bit heavier than the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, it's body is still thinner.
Galaxy C9 Pro has a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores. Galaxy C9 Pro has a little more vivid display than Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px, a just a bit less pixels per display inch and a quite smaller display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion captures slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion also has a lot higher resolution back facing camera. The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion counts with a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion counts with better battery life than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.