Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-29 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 474 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 has a score of 85, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo's 81.9 overall score. IPhone 8's body is lighter and a little bit thinner than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it was released 7 years before. The iPhone 8 has a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has less CPU cores and 6 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much more vibrant screen than iPhone 8, because it has a much brighter display, a way higher resolution of 1256 x 2760 pixels, a greater pixels amount in each display inch and a really larger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a superior camera than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution and a same size camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a much bigger camera sensor and a camera with much more MP.
The iPhone 8's storage for apps and games is very similar to the Motorola Edge 50 Neo one, both have the same internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a very superior battery performance than Apple iPhone 8, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity instead of 1821mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.