Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-29 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a global score of 81.9, which is a bit better than Google Pixel XL's overall score of 81.3. Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a incredibly newer and just a little bit thinner cellphone than Google Pixel XL, although it's also a little bit heavier. The Google Pixel XL counts with a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a brighter screen than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a bit lower screen density and a little bit lower 1256 x 2760 resolution, it also counts with a bigger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much better memory for games and applications than Google Pixel XL, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo takes greater videos and photos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a way larger back camera sensor taking much better quality pictures, a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a bigger camera aperture for better low-light captures.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features longer battery duration than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 4310mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.