Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-29 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 474 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is slightly better than LG V20, with a global score of 81.9 against 77. Motorola Edge 50 Neo's construction is extremely newer and a little lighter than LG V20's, but it's also just a little thicker. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a lot better looking screen than LG V20, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1256 x 2760 and a bit worse amount of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit larger screen.
The LG V20 counts with a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and less CPU cores. LG V20 counts with a bigger storage to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has greater battery performance than LG V20, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a superior camera than LG V20, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a F1.8 aperture and the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs and a much more MP camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.