Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-08-29 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, having an 83.7 score against 81.9. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version and Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 version. Although LG V50 ThinQ is a better phone than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, it must be told that it's also noticeably older, a little thicker and a little bit heavier.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a brighter screen than LG V50 ThinQ, although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the display and a quite lower 1256 x 2760px resolution, they both have a screen with the same size.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with much more storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a lot larger camera sensor capturing much better quality photographs and a back camera with a lot higher 50 MP resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a little better battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 4310mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.