Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a little bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, having a global score of 81.9 against 77.9. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 Neo has an older 14 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo design is noticeably newer, way thinner and a little lighter than Motorola DROID Turbo.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has 4 lesser CPU cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra GPU. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a just a little lower screen pixel density and a little lower resolution of 1256 x 2760px, it also counts with a bigger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a superior camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos in low-light environments, faster 30 frames per second video frame rate and a much higher resolution camera.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a lot bigger memory to store more games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a bit longer battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4310mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.