Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 474 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a global score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than Moto G Stylus's 79.7 global score. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a extremely newer cellphone, and it's also lighter and thinner than the Moto G Stylus. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a more recent 14 version and Moto G Stylus has Android 11 version, so it gives some extra features.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a way better looking display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a bit higher count of pixels in each inch of screen and a slightly higher 1256 x 2760px resolution. The Moto G Stylus counts with a little bit better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Moto G Stylus features a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a bit better battery life than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has an 8 percent more battery size. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo captures a bit better photographs and videos than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing photos in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a more MP back camera and a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.