Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android |
| 2024-08-29 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | TFT |
| 474 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo's general score of 81.9. Galaxy A32 works with Android OS, while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 OS. Galaxy A32 is an extremely older, somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker phone than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way higher 1256 x 2760 resolution and a lot higher pixels quantity per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy A32 features a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a bit more storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A32, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo shoots clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a back facing camera with a higher 50 MP resolution.
The Galaxy A32 features better battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.