Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-08-29 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A60 is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, having an 82.3 score against 81.9. The Samsung Galaxy A60 is an notably older phone than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, but it is a little bit lighter and just a little thinner anyway. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A60 has older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14.
The Samsung Galaxy A60 features a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has an incredibly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has a bit higher 1256 x 2760 resolution, a bit larger display and a just a little better pixels quantity per inch of display.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking photographs in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a way bigger sensor and a camera in the back with a lot better resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.