Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-29 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, having an 84.2 score against 81.9. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018)'s construction is just a little bit thinner and a little lighter than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it was released 6 years before. Galaxy A7 (2018) features a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a bit more pixels per inch of display, a higher resolution of 1256 x 2760 and a little larger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a superior camera than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing images and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher resolution, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor and a lot higher (4K) video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with just a bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 31% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.