Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-29 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 has a general score of 84.9, which is a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo's 81.9 overall score. Samsung Galaxy A80's design is much older, heavier and somewhat thicker than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo. The Galaxy A80 features a much faster processor than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Both have a Octa-Core processor and a 8 GB RAM memory.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels density and a slightly better 1256 x 2760 pixels resolution. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo takes slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a back facing camera with a better resolution, a way bigger sensor and a bigger aperture.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy A80, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a bit superior battery life than Galaxy A80, because it has a 16% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.