Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android |
| 2024-08-29 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G has a score of 90.5, which is much better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo's 81.9 score. The Galaxy A90 5G comes with Android OS, while Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with Android 14 OS. Even though Galaxy A90 5G is a better phone than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, we must tell that it is also a incredibly older, just a little thicker and somewhat heavier phone.
The Galaxy A90 5G features an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1256 x 2760 pixels resolution and a quite better display density.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo captures slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography and a more megapixels camera in the back.
The Galaxy A90 5G features slightly more storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB. Galaxy A90 5G counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 4 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.