Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2024-08-29 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Black and Gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a little bit better than the Galaxy C9 Pro, with a general score of 81.9 against 81. Motorola Edge 50 Neo's body is incredibly newer and just a bit lighter than the Galaxy C9 Pro's, although it's thicker. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Neo has an older 14 version and Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a way better display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a higher 1256 x 2760px resolution, a little bit bigger screen and a higher pixel count in each inch of screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with much more storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 4310mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a back facing camera with a much better resolution, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.