Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-29 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, having an 87.1 score against 81.9. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note9 is a better phone than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, we must note that it is also notably older, just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The Galaxy Note9 features a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a brighter screen than Galaxy Note9, although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1256 x 2760px and a just a bit worse pixels density, they both have a display with the same size. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a camera with a much higher resolution and a way larger back camera sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality.
The Galaxy Note9 counts with just a bit more memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a 4310mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.