Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a general score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 score. Although the Motorola Edge 50 Neo and vivo X Fold 3 Pro were only released 5 months apart, Motorola Edge 50 Neo's construction is notably lighter but also a lot thicker. These phones include the same Android 14 OS.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a bit better display than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a little bit worse screen pixels density, it also counts with more display brightness, a better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels and a bigger screen. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has 256 GB more internal memory capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a little faster processor than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, and although they both have a 50 MP back-facing camera, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better images and videos in low-light environments and a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality pictures.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with superior battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 32% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.