Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-29 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 474 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, getting an 85.5 score against 81.9. Despite being the best cellphone we are comparing here, we must tell that it's also a incredibly older, just a bit heavier and a bit thicker cellphone. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a lot better screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a really brighter screen, a higher resolution of 1256 x 2760, a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display and a little bit larger display.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 256 GB. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Both of them have a 8 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo takes better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a larger camera aperture, a way more mega-pixels back facing camera and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a lot higher photo and video quality.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features just a little better battery performance than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has an 8% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.