Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-06-19 |
| -- | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 6.53 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is much better than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), having a overall score of 91.8 against 78.9. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has Android 14 version. The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Galaxy A71 5G has a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024). Both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the same screen density and a display with the same size. The Galaxy A71 5G features a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) counts with just a little better battery life than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G captures slightly better videos and photos than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a much better resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.