Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a bit better than Google Pixel XL, getting a score of 86.3 against 81.3. Although Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a bit heavier than Google Pixel XL, it's just a little bit thinner and noticeably newer. The Google Pixel XL has a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has less processing cores and 8 GB lesser RAM memory.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a little sharper display than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a lot worse pixel density and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a larger display. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a camera with a way better 50 megapixels resolution and a way larger aperture.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel XL, because it has 384 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.