Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Aurora black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has an overall score of 86.3, which is a little bit better than the LG V50 ThinQ's 83.7 overall score. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a noticeably newer and a little thinner phone than LG V50 ThinQ, but it is also just a little heavier. Both devices in our current comparison include Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has 14 version and LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10, so it offers some nice extra features.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a bit better looking display than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a much lower 1080 x 2400px resolution and a much worse pixel density, it also counts with a little bigger display. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features just a bit bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
LG V50 ThinQ has a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro takes better photographs and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality photos, a back facing camera with a much higher resolution and a larger aperture to take better images and videos in low-light situations.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.