Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a general score of 86.3, which is much better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's overall score of 76.4. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro design is way newer and thinner, but also just a little bit heavier than Motorola Droid Turbo. Both devices in this comparison use Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has older 14 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has 9 GB lesser RAM memory and 4 lesser cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a graphics processing unit. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit better display than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a greater screen pixels density.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a lot more MP back-facing camera, a way larger diafragm aperture to capture better images in poorly lited environments and better 30 frames per second video frame rates.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a very superior memory to install games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 512 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features just a little better battery duration than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.