Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a score of 86.3, which is much better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's score of 77.9. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro body is notably newer and incredibly thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo's, although it's a bit heavier. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has older 14 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a little bit better display than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has lesser RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro takes greater pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a camera in the back with a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution, a lot larger diafragm aperture and faster video frame rates.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has just a bit longer battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 15 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.