Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android |
| 2024-04-16 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | TFT |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a little bit better than the Galaxy A32, getting a global score of 86.3 against 84.7. Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a extremely newer phone, and it is also somewhat thinner and a little lighter than Galaxy A32. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro works with Android 14 operating system, while Galaxy A32 comes with Android operating system.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a greater pixels quantity in each inch of display, a quite larger display and a way better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. Galaxy A32 features a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro takes a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a much bigger camera aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited environments and a more mega pixels camera.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with much more memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A32 has a little better battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has an 11% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.