Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a score of 86.3, which is slightly better than Galaxy A7 (2018)'s overall score of 84.2. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro construction is much newer, but a little bit heavier and a little thicker than Galaxy A7 (2018). The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a just a bit lower display density, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much better storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has improved battery performance than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a very superior camera than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a way bigger camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and pictures, a lot higher (4K) video resolution, a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels and a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.