Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Black and White |
| Aluminum | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G has a score of 90.5, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro's 86.3 score. The Galaxy A90 5G has Android OS, while Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14 OS. Even being the best device in this comparison, Galaxy A90 5G's construction is notably older, just a little heavier and just a bit thicker than Motorola Edge 50 Pro.
The Galaxy A90 5G features a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G. They have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a better amount of pixels per inch of screen and a same size display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a better resolution back-facing camera, a much bigger camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photos and a lot larger camera aperture to take better low-light captures and videos.
The Galaxy A90 5G's battery performance is very similar to the battery lifetime in Motorola Edge 50 Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.