Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2024-04-16 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, with an 86.3 score against 81. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a extremely newer and just a bit lighter phone than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, but it is somewhat thicker. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has older 14 version and Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bigger display, a little greater display density and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a way larger camera aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light environments, a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels and a lot better (4K) video resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.