Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M31s has a score of 88, which is a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro's 86.3 overall score. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy M31s has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14. Despite being the best we compare here, the Galaxy M31s is a incredibly older, just a bit heavier and somewhat thicker device than Motorola Edge 50 Pro.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a more vivid screen than Galaxy M31s, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a little larger display. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M31s, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy M31s counts with a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Galaxy M31s counts with improved battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy M31s captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a smaller sensor taking lower quality videos and images and a way smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Galaxy M31s also counts with a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.