Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, with an 87.1 score against 86.3. Even being the best device in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 body is notably older, a little thicker and just a little heavier than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro. The Galaxy Note9 counts with a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a way worse 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a bit bigger screen. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much greater memory for applications and games than Galaxy Note9, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4000mAh. Motorola Edge 50 Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a way larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a larger diafragm aperture for better images and videos in low light environments and a back facing camera with a lot higher 50 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.