Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.1 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a bit better than the Galaxy S6 edge+, getting an 86.3 score against 79.3. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro construction is incredibly newer, but heavier and thicker than the Galaxy S6 edge+. Both devices in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has newer 14 version while Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1 version, giving a couple additional features and increased performance.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ features a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 7 lesser CPU cores (although they are faster) and less RAM memory. The Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and more pixels per display inch.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a lot bigger sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photographs, a much bigger camera aperture and a camera with a way better 50 mega pixels resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 448 GB more internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.