Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Black and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with an 86.3 score against 77.8. Although the Motorola Edge 50 Pro and the vivo X Fold 3 Pro were released with only a few months difference, Motorola Edge 50 Pro's body is somewhat lighter but also noticeably thicker. Both phones we compare here include the same Android 14 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a little better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has more RAM memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a better looking screen than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has a lot higher 2200 x 2480 resolution, way more brightness, a bigger screen and a quite greater pixel density.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a larger sensor which gives a better photo and video quality.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has as much storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the Motorola Edge 50 Pro one, both of them have exactly the same internal memory capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features greater battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.