Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-16 | -- |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 6.95 ounces | -- |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | -- |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 481 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (120 fps) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is just a bit better than Nokia 9.3 PureView, with a overall score of 87.1 against 84.2. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more recent 14 version and Nokia 9.3 PureView has Android 11. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a better screen than Nokia 9.3 PureView, although it has a just a little inferior pixel count per inch in the display and a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, they both have a display with the same size.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Nokia 9.3 PureView, because it has 384 GB more internal storage. The Nokia 9.3 PureView features a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Nokia 9.3 PureView has a bit superior battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The Nokia 9.3 PureView counts with a much better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light photography and video and a tinier back camera sensor taking less light and dull colors, it also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.