Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Oppo |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is slightly better than OPPO Find X3 Pro's 79.9 general score. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version while OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11, so it provides the user a lot of extra features and enhanced performance. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is notably newer than OPPO Find X3 Pro, it's just a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a bit more vivid display than OPPO Find X3 Pro, although it has a lot worse pixel quantity per inch of screen and a lot worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, they both have a same size display. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because it has 256 GB more internal memory capacity.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and 12 GB of RAM memory. OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a battery lifetime that's very similar to Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's battery life. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes clearer photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Pro, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger aperture to take better low light images and a larger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.