Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black and White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G has a general score of 90.5, which is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's 87.1 general score. Even though the Galaxy A90 5G is older and just a bit heavier than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, it's body is still just a bit thinner. The Galaxy A90 5G counts with Android OS, while Motorola Edge 50 Ultra works with Android 14 OS.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a better display than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G. Both of them have the same count of pixels in each inch in the display, a display with the same size and exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much greater memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Galaxy A90 5G's battery lifetime is just as good as the battery performance in Motorola Edge 50 Ultra. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a larger aperture, a much larger sensor shooting way higher quality pictures, a more mega-pixels back camera and faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.