Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-08 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 8 Plus has a score of 87.1, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 overall score. Despite of the fact Apple iPhone 8 Plus is incredibly older and somewhat heavier than Motorola Edge 50, it's body is still just a little bit thinner. The Motorola Edge 50 has a slightly better looking screen than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because it has much more brightness, a bigger screen, a quite better number of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1220 x 2712.
IPhone 8 Plus has a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has less processing cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processor. The Motorola Edge 50 captures better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a much more MP back-facing camera and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality.
The Apple iPhone 8 Plus counts with as much memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the Motorola Edge 50, both of them have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 has a much longer battery life than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 2691mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.