Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-08 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is a bit better than Motorola Edge 50's general score of 81.2. IPhone X's design is just a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than Motorola Edge 50, even though it was released many years before. The Apple iPhone X has a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and 2 lesser CPU cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Motorola Edge 50 features a bit sharper display than Apple iPhone X, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with way more screen brightness, a larger screen and a slightly better 1220 x 2712 pixels resolution. IPhone X's storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to the Motorola Edge 50 one, both of them have equal internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 50 features a much better battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has an 84% more battery size. Motorola Edge 50 features a much better camera than iPhone X, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.