Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-08 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR has a score of 82, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 global score. IPhone XR is a noticeably older, just a bit heavier and a little bit thicker phone than Motorola Edge 50. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a more vivid screen than iPhone XR, because it has a really brighter screen, a quite bigger screen, a lot higher 1220 x 2712px resolution and a greater display pixels density.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a way bigger storage for applications and games than iPhone XR, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Apple iPhone XR has a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and 2 less CPU cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The Motorola Edge 50 features a much better camera than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a back camera with lot more megapixels and a much larger camera sensor shooting way better quality pictures and videos.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2942mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.