Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-08 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Black and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL has an overall score of 82.5, which is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 50's global score of 81.2. The Google Pixel 2 XL is a a little bit lighter phone than the Motorola Edge 50, but both are 0.31inches thick. The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Motorola Edge 50 features a slightly better screen than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a bit less pixels per display inch and a bit lower resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels, it also counts with a quite larger display. Motorola Edge 50 has much more memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Motorola Edge 50 has a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3520mAh. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a way bigger back camera sensor taking way higher quality photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.