Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-08-08 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 has a global score of 81.2, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3a's overall score of 78.8. Motorola Edge 50's construction is incredibly newer and a little bit thinner, but somewhat heavier than Google Pixel 3a. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 has 14 version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11.
Motorola Edge 50 has a brighter display than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a larger display, a bit better pixel number per inch of display and a quite better resolution of 1220 x 2712. Google Pixel 3a has a much faster processor than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Motorola Edge 50 captures better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video quality and the same camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a camera with a lot better resolution and a lot bigger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with much more storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 192 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 has a way better battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 67 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.