Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-08-08 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 is just a bit better than Google Pixel 3a XL, with a general score of 81.2 against 78.9. The Motorola Edge 50 construction is extremely newer and just a little bit thinner, but just a bit heavier than Google Pixel 3a XL. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 has newer 14 version while Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11, so it provides some nice extra features and performance optimizations.
The Google Pixel 3a XL features a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 50, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Motorola Edge 50 features a better display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a little bit better pixels amount in each screen inch, a little bit larger screen and a higher resolution of 1220 x 2712.
Motorola Edge 50 features a better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a F1.8 aperture and the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Motorola Edge 50 has a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 35% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.