Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-08 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50, getting a general score of 81.9 against 81.2. Even though the Google Pixel 4 is a lot older and just a little thicker than the Motorola Edge 50, it's construction is still somewhat lighter. The Motorola Edge 50 has a sharper screen than Google Pixel 4, because it has a quite better 1220 x 2712 pixels resolution, a bit better pixel quantity per inch in the screen and a bigger display.
Motorola Edge 50 has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal storage capacity. Google Pixel 4 counts with a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Motorola Edge 50 features a much better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for shooting images and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way better resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.