Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Just black |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has a score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 global score. Even though Google Pixel 4a is much older and just a bit thicker than the Motorola Edge 50, it's construction is still much lighter. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 4a has 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version.
Motorola Edge 50 features a better looking screen than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same pixels density, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a slightly higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 and a larger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 has a superior storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
The Google Pixel 4a features a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos and a much better resolution camera.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 59% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.