Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a score of 87.5, which is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 general score. Both phones in this review include Android OS, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a much older and a little bit thicker phone than Motorola Edge 50, but Google made it just a little bit lighter anyway.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a sharper display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a bit bigger display, a quite greater pixel quantity per screen inch and a slightly better resolution of 1220 x 2712px.
The Motorola Edge 50 has much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 has a much better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing pictures or videos in poorly lited environments and slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a way larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot better resolution back facing camera.
The Motorola Edge 50 features better battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3885mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.