Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-08 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has a score of 89, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 overall score. Google Pixel 5 is a somewhat lighter cellphone than the Motorola Edge 50, but they are equally thin. Google Pixel 5 features an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 50. They have a Octa-Core processor and a 8 GB RAM.
Motorola Edge 50 features a brighter screen than Google Pixel 5, because it has a little bit larger screen, a just a bit better amount of pixels per screen inch and a slightly higher resolution of 1220 x 2712px. The Motorola Edge 50 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting photos or videos in low light situations and worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a much more megapixels back-facing camera and a way larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Motorola Edge 50 features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because it has more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 counts with improved battery performance than Google Pixel 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4080mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.