Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 444 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 is a little bit better than HTC One M9, with an 81.2 score against 77.7. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 has 14 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, offering some nice extra features. Motorola Edge 50's design is much newer and somewhat thinner, but heavier than HTC One M9.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a little bit better looking screen than HTC One M9, because it has a lot bigger screen, a better 1220 x 2712px resolution and a quite better display density. The HTC One M9 features a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional graphics processing unit and a 64-bit processing unit.
Motorola Edge 50 features a much better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a back-facing camera with a way better resolution, a lot larger camera sensor capturing way higher quality photographs and videos and a larger aperture.
Motorola Edge 50 has a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 features a much longer battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.