Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-08 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 444 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 is a bit better than the HTC U Ultra, getting a score of 81.2 against 77. Motorola Edge 50 is a a little heavier phone than the HTC U Ultra, but they are equally thin. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a more vivid display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a little bit lower 1220 x 2712px resolution and a little bit worse screen density, it also counts with a bigger screen.
HTC U Ultra counts with a better storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. HTC U Ultra counts with a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM.
Motorola Edge 50 features a much longer battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 67 percent larger battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 takes much clearer photos and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the same video frame rate and a same size camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a lot bigger camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.