Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-08 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 444 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 is a bit better than HTC U11, with an 81.2 score against 77.6. Motorola Edge 50 is a just a little bit heavier cellphone than HTC U11, but they are equally thin. The Motorola Edge 50 features just a bit better display than HTC U11, because although it has a little bit less pixels per display inch and a quite lower resolution of 1220 x 2712, it also counts with a bigger display.
The HTC U11 features a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than HTC U11, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 has a much better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels and a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.