Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2024-08-08 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 has a global score of 81.2, which is slightly better than the LG G7 Fit's 77 global score. The Motorola Edge 50 is a somewhat heavier phone than the LG G7 Fit, but both of them are equally thin. Both phones in this comparison review have Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 has the previous 14 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
LG G7 Fit counts with a little sharper display than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and much darker screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a better pixels density. LG G7 Fit counts with a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster) and a lower amount of RAM.
Motorola Edge 50 features a little bit better memory capacity to store more games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 shoots much better photographs and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light images and video and a much better resolution back camera.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a superior battery lifetime than LG G7 Fit, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.