Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-08-08 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8 ThinQ has an overall score of 84.3, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50's general score of 81.2. Despite of the fact LG G8 ThinQ is way older and a little thicker than the Motorola Edge 50, it's design is still a little lighter. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG G8 ThinQ has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14.
LG G8 ThinQ has a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. LG G8 ThinQ has a screen that's just as good as Motorola Edge 50's screen, because although the LG G8 ThinQ has much worse brightness and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher display pixels density and a slightly better 1440 x 3120 resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 captures better videos and photos than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture and worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a much higher resolution back-facing camera and a lot bigger sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photos.
The LG G8 ThinQ features a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 50 has a much better battery lifetime than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 43% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.