Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2024-08-08 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50, having an 82.5 score against 81.2. Despite of the fact that LG V30S ThinQ is notably older than Motorola Edge 50, it's design is a little thinner and lighter. These devices work with Android operating system, but the LG V30S ThinQ has newer 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version, so it provides you lots of additional features and a performance increase.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a little bit better looking display than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of display and a quite lower 1220 x 2712 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bigger screen.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 50 has a superior camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better resolution and a much bigger sensor capturing way higher quality videos and pictures.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a much better battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.