Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-08 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 general score. The LG V35 ThinQ is an extremely older phone than Motorola Edge 50, but LG was able to build it just a little thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. Motorola Edge 50 has a slightly better looking display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a quite lower 1220 x 2712 resolution and a quite worse display pixels density, it also counts with a little larger screen.
LG V35 ThinQ features a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. LG V35 ThinQ features a better memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a superior camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a way larger back camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality and a lot more MP camera in the back.
The Motorola Edge 50 features a superior battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.